NUR1110 Reflective Essay 护理 assignment 代写

  • 100%原创包过,高质代写&免费提供Turnitin报告--24小时客服QQ&微信:120591129
  • NUR1110 Reflective Essay 护理 assignment 代写

    NUR1110: Assessment Task 4 -Reflective Essay
    Reflection and critical thinking are integral skills for professional nurses and midwives to develop. For
    Assessment Task 4 you are asked to demonstrate your development as a reflective learner by
    discussing reflection and critical thinking supported by scholarly references and applying your
    knowledge to a learning experience.
    In Week 9, 10 or 11 you will be/were involved in an e-Simulation exercise which may/may not have
    exposed you to an experience you have never had before. In the Simulation you were asked to
    suspend judgement and just be in the experience. For this exercise, you are asked to deeply reflect
    on your experience of the e-Simulation as if it had been an actual, rather than a simulated experience.
    If you had really been in that situation, how would you reflect on the learning from that experience?
    The Simulation will bring together learning from a number of your core units so that you can reflect on
    the communication, cultural and other aspects of the experience, and how the experience may help to
    inform your future practice as a health professional.
    You are required to use the Gibbs Reflective Cycle (1988) as the framework from which to write
    your reflective assessment piece. Below is a representation of the six (6) stages in the cycle. We were
    introduced to this model in Week 2 and will be revising the model in Workshops before the
    assessment due date.
    To assist you with this activity further the marking rubric also reflects the six (6) stages of the Gibbs
    Reflective Cycle (1988). See following. Please also note the formatting instructions on Moodle under
    Assessment Task 4- Reflective Essay section.
    Assessment Criteria Student ID:__________________
    Criterion  High Distinction (80-
    100%)
    Distinction (70-79%)  Credit (60-69%)  Pass (50-59%)  Fail (< 50%)
    Introduction
    /5
    Imaginative introduction
    which outlines the
    event/incident scope
    and discusses the
    framework being used
    Interesting introduction
    of topic where
    event/incident scope
    and framework being
    used identified.
    Briefly, states the
    event/incident Defines the
    scope and context of the
    paper.
    Too long or too short.
    Some material in
    introduction belongs in the
    body. Key information
    missing
    Rambling and unfocused
    or no introduction at all
    Description
    /10
    Describes the event or
    incident with numerous
    supporting details which
    are organised logically
    and coherently. The
    description provides the
    context and background
    for reflective writing
    Describes the event or
    incident with some
    supporting details and
    examples in an
    organised manner. The
    description provides a
    context for reflection.
    Describes the event or
    incident with few details or
    examples in a somewhat
    organised manner.
    Describes the event or
    incident poorly with few or
    no details.
    Does not describe the
    event or incident.
    Feelings
    /10
    A comprehensive
    discussion of
    behaviours, feelings and
    reactions. Detailed
    exploration and analysis
    of their implications.
    A comprehensive
    discussion of
    behaviours, feelings and
    reactions. Detailed
    exploration and analysis
    of their implications
    Some discussion of
    behaviours, feelings and
    reactions. Some
    exploration and analysis
    of their implications
    Discusses behaviours,
    feelings and reactions
    with some details. Minimal
    exploration and analysis
    of implications
    Does not discuss
    behaviours, feelings and
    reactions. Does not
    explore or analyse their
    implications
    Evaluation
    /10
    Identification of issues
    which require action and
    comprehensive
    discussion of them
    Identification of issues,
    which require action and
    discussion of them.
    Identification of issues,
    which require action.
    Minimal appraisal of
    issues
    No appraisal of issues
    Analysis
    /10
    Discussion of analysis of
    historical and social
    factors influencing the
    situation using scholarly
    literature.
    Description of analysis
    of historical and social
    factors influencing the
    situation using scholarly
    literature.
    Some evidence of
    analysis of historical and
    social factors influencing
    the situation. Some
    reference to scholarly
    literature.
    Minimal evidence of
    analysis of historical and
    social factors influencing
    the situation. Minimal
    reference to scholarly
    literature.
    No evidence of analysis of
    historical and social
    factors influencing the
    situation. No use of
    scholarly literature.
    Conclusion
    /10
    Insightfully relates
    concepts and ideas from
    multiple sources; uses
    new information to
    enhance chosen
    solution; recognizes
    missing information;
    correctly identifies
    potential effects of new
    information.
    Accurately relates
    concepts and ideas from
    multiple sources; uses
    new information to
    enhance chosen
    solution; correctly
    identifies potential
    effects of new
    information.
    Inaccurately or
    incompletely relates
    concepts and ideas from
    multiple sources; shallow
    determination of effect of
    new information on
    chosen solution.
    Poorly integrates
    information from more
    than one source to
    support chosen solution;
    Incorrectly predicts the
    effect of new information
    on chosen solution.
    Does not identify new
    information for chosen
    solution.
    Action plan
    /10
    Thoroughly identifies
    and addresses key
    aspects of the problem
    and insightfully uses
    evidence from analysis
    to support and defend
    potentially valid
    solutions.
    Identifies and addresses
    key aspects of the
    problem and uses
    evidence from analysis
    to develop potentially
    valid conclusions or
    solutions.
    Identifies and addresses
    some aspects of the
    problem; develops
    possible conclusions or
    solutions using some
    inappropriate opinions
    and irrelevant information
    from analysis.
    Identifies and addresses
    only one aspect of the
    problem or develops invalid
    conclusions or solutions
    based on opinion or
    irrelevant information.
    Does not select and
    defend a solution.
    Conclusion
    of reflection
    /10
    Identifies strengths and
    weaknesses in own
    thinking: recognizes
    personal assumptions,
    values and perspectives,
    compares to others’, and
    evaluates them in the
    context of alternate
    points of view.
    Identifies strengths and
    weaknesses in own
    thinking: recognizes
    personal assumptions,
    values and perspectives,
    compares to others’,
    with some comparisons
    of alternate points of
    view.
    Identifies some personal
    assumptions, values, and
    perspectives;
    recognizes some
    assumptions, values and
    perspectives of others;
    shallow comparisons of
    alternate points of view.
    Identifies some personal
    assumptions, values, and
    perspectives;
    does not consider
    alternate points of view.
    Does not reflect on own
    thinking
    The student
    writes clearly
    and
    coherently,
    in a style
    appropriate
    for a critical
    reflection.
    /10
    Well written piece which
    presents a coherent and
    well argued critical
    reflection
    A coherent piece of
    writing in which there is
    some evidence of critical
    reflection
    Adequately written for
    clarity though there is no
    critical reflection
    presented.
    Writing which conveys
    basic information but in a
    way that is difficult to
    understand and not well
    structured to convey a
    coherent critical reflection
    Writing which is
    unstructured, unclear and
    disorganised.
    References
    including
    research
    (recent
    studies are
    best), policy
    documents
    (from
    relevant
    bodies)
    and/or
    theory (from
    academic
    sources) to
    support
    analysis.
    APA 6th
    referencing
    guidelines
    clearly
    demonstrate
    d.
    /10
    Supported by research
    studies), policy
    documents and/or
    theory to support
    analysis.APA 6th
    referencing guidelines
    used.
    Some references used
    to support the analysis.
    APA 6th referencing
    guidelines used, minor
    errors in reference list
    and/ or in-text.
    References are provided
    but are not recent or
    relevant publications, or
    do not support the
    student’s analysis.
    APA 6th referencing
    guidelines used, major
    errors in reference list
    and/ or in-text.
    Limited number of
    references provided,
    some from non-scholarly
    sources.
    Referencing does not
    comply with APA 6th
    guidelines.
    Few or no relevant
    reference.
    No attempt at referencing
    or referencing does not
    permit sourcing of
    documents mentioned in
    your reflection..
    Conclusion
    /5
    Analytical and clear

    NUR1110 Reflective Essay 护理 assignment 代写
    conclusion well-
    grounded in literature
    but stated in own words.
    Introduces no new ideas
    Good development
    shown in summary of
    key points & ideas
    included in the body &
    based on literature
    Evidence of conclusion
    grounded in literature
    Limited evidence of
    conclusion based on
    literature
    Unsubstantiated
    conclusion, or no
    conclusion at all
    Marked by: _____________ Moderated by_____________________
    (if required)
    Date _________ Raw Mark /100
    ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
    NUR1110 Reflective Essay 护理 assignment 代写