Introduction to Technical Article Review 代写

  • 100%原创包过,高质代写&免费提供Turnitin报告--24小时客服QQ&微信:120591129
  • Introduction to Technical  Article Review 代写

    1
    Assessment 2 Article Review and Poster
    Diploma of Engineering
    Diploma of Information Technology
    Introduction to Technical Communication
    EITC001 IITC001
    SEMESTER 03 2017
    Credit points : 6
    Pre-requisites : none
    Subject Coordinator : Julie Sparks
    Weight: 25%
    Due Date: Week 5 (Article Review) Week 5 (Poster)
    ASSESSMENT TASK 2 : LESSONS LEARNT IN ENGINEERING AND IT –
    ARTICLE REVIEW AND POSTER PRESENTATION (WEIGHT 25%)
    TASK DESCRIPTION
    Students individually investigating an engineering or IT failure. One source is selected
    on the case study for analysis according to the scaffold taught in the subject. A poster
    is created to inform the class about the topic.
    LEARNING OUTCOMES
    • (a) understand the role and value of communication in academic and professional
    engineering and IT environments
    • (b) use the UTS Library and Internet to access information using research and reading
    skills
    • (c) write competently in English, in a variety of genres, demonstrating your knowledge
    of referencing, synthesis of information and the rules of plagiarism
    • (d) participate effectively in peer learning activities
    • (e) perform competently in oral communication situations with appropriate visual aids
    • (f) demonstrate an ability to express technical and other concepts through
    graphical/mathematical/visual communication
    • (g) demonstrate creativity in presentations
    • (h) reflect on personal learning experiences
    Note : The information in this subject outline was correct at the time of printing. However, you should check
    eStudent regularly for any updates to the information contained in this subject outline.
    2
    BRIEF
    Part A: Lessons Learnt in Engineering and IT – Article Review 900 words 20%
    Students investigate an engineering or IT event where there were lessons learnt that can be
    applied to future projects. The failures or events do not have to be catastrophic and can relate
    to process, maintenance, human error, construction techniques, design etc. Students can
    choose from a list of topics or, in consultation with their Tutor, nominate their own. Students
    find ONE (1) suitable and reliable source on their Lessons Learnt case study. The source
    should ideally be around 2-6 pages. Students should focus on the background to the event
    rather than the lessons learnt. Include peer review checklist with your report.
    Questions that COULD be answered include:
    •  When did the event occur?
    •  Who did it involve?
    •  Where did it happen?
    •  What happened?
    •  Why or how did it happen? What was the cause?
    •  Who was responsible?
    •  What was the cost – lives and money?
    •  Anything else of interest – but NOT engineering lessons learnt.
    Part B: Lessons Learnt in Engineering and IT – Poster Presentation 5%
    Students prepare a one page poster and have one-two minutes to tell the class about their
    topic.
    The poster is presented in class Week 5. Students can select their own creative way to present
    the poster but it must be single page shown on computer screen. Presentation must introduce
    the topic to the class. Poster should contain both text and graphics. Poster should be
    uploaded to TURNITIN before presentation.
    DUE DATE
    Part A: Lessons Learnt in Engineering and IT – Article Review
    Due Week 5
    Part B: Lessons Learnt in Engineering and IT – Two Minute Poster Presentation
    Due Week 5
    3
    STYLE GUIDE REQUIREMENTS
    • Each written task must be stapled.
    • Submission is via hard copy. TURNITIN is a plagiarism check.
    • Submit a soft copy of each written task to Turnitin and a hard copy to your tutor at the
    start of class. Include a signed UTS:INSEARCH cover page.
    • Print single or double sided A4 paper.
    • Use 12 point Arial or Times New Roman font.
    • Use 1.5 spacing and at least 2.5cm page margins.
    • Include a header and footer on each page with:
    o  Header: subject name and code, title of assessment task
    o  Footer: your name and student number, page number
    NOTES
     Your assignment must be free of plagiarism and be written by yourself without assistance.
     Late assignments will not be accepted unless there are exceptional circumstances and/or you make
    arrangements in writing with the tutor before the due date. (See the subject description for further details.)
     If your assignment receives a pass mark or higher, the mark is final. Your tutor will explain why you
    were awarded the mark, but cannot change it.
     Always keep electronic and/or hard copies of your assignments. Things can go wrong and
    assignments can go missing. If they do, it is your responsibility to be able to re-submit your work
    when requested.
    4
    Assessment Criteria
    HD  D  C  P
    1
    Layout and
    Introduction
    identification,
    academic reliability
    10%
    Assessment followed
    style guide.
    Exceptionally well set
    out. Exceptionally clear
    identification of text, and
    analysis of its academic
    reliability. Includes
    second source for
    verification.
    Assessment followed
    style guide. Very well
    set out. Clear
    identification of text, and
    analysis of its academic
    reliability. Includes
    second source for
    verification.
    Assessment followed style
    guide. Well set out. More
    than satisfactory
    identification of text, and
    analysis of its academic
    reliability of the text.
    Assessment followed
    most elements of style
    guide. Well set out.
    Basic identification of
    text, and analysis of its
    academic reliability.
    2
    Introduction
    purpose, preview
    10%
    Exceptionally clear
    enunciation of purpose
    and preview of textual
    analysis and
    exceptionally concise
    and comprehensive
    overview of the main
    sections and purpose of
    the source text.
    Clear enunciation of
    purpose and preview of
    textual analysis and
    concise and
    comprehensive overview
    of the main sections and
    purpose of the source
    text.
    More than satisfactory
    enunciation of purpose
    and preview of textual
    analysis and more than
    satisfactory overview of
    the main sections and
    purpose of the source text.
    Basic enunciation of
    purpose and preview of
    textual analysis and
    satisfactory overview of
    the main sections and
    purpose of the source
    text.
    3
    Evidence of Active
    Reading
    15%
    Richly detailed evidence
    of active reading and
    notes was submitted.
    Questions/answers are
    detailed and well-
    paraphrased. Full,
    Harvard-UTS styled
    reference is present on
    notes.
    Richly detailed evidence
    of active reading was
    submitted.
    Questions/answers are
    well-paraphrased.
    Important details of
    references are present
    on notes.
    Sufficiently detailed
    evidence of active reading
    was submitted.
    Questions/answers are
    well-paraphrased.
    Important details of
    references are present on
    notes.
    Passably detailed
    evidence of active
    reading was submitted.
    Questions/answers are
    well-paraphrased.
    Important details of
    references are present
    on notes.
    4
    Summary
    20%
    Excellent summary of
    main points and the
    relationship between
    them.
    Very good summary of
    main points and the
    relationship between
    them.
    Good summary of main
    points and the relationship
    between them.
    Adequate summary of
    main points and the
    relationship between
    them.
    5
    Conclusion 10%  Excellent summary of
    report and concluding
    statement of relationship
    of text to the semester
    topic. Excellent details
    of further research.
    Very good summary of
    report and concluding
    statement of relationship
    of text to the semester
    topic. Very good details
    of further research.
    Good summary of report
    and concluding statement
    of relationship of text to
    the semester topic. Very
    good details of further
    research.
    Adequate summary of
    report and concluding
    statement of relationship
    of text to the semester
    topic. Good details of
    further research.
    6
    Referencing
    5%
    In-text reference present
    and correct. End-of-text
    reference present and
    correct
    In-text reference present
    with only insignificant
    errors or omissions
    and/or end-of-text
    reference present with
    only insignificant errors
    or omissions.
    In-text reference present
    but with minor errors or
    omissions and/or end-of-
    text reference present but
    with minor errors or
    omissions
    In-text reference present
    but with significant
    errors or omissions
    and/or end-of-text
    reference present but
    with significant errors or
    omissions
    7
    Language and
    paragraph structure
    10%
    Meaning is very clear.
    Paper has consistently
    correct grammar,
    spelling and paragraph
    structure.
    Meaning is very clear.
    Paper has predominantly
    correct grammar,
    spelling and paragraph
    structure.
    Meaning is clear. Paper
    has only insignificant
    errors in grammar and/or
    spelling and/or paragraph
    structure.
    Meaning is generally
    clear. Paper has a few
    errors in grammar and/or
    spelling and/or
    paragraph structure.
    8
    Poster Presentation
    20%
    Research was presented
    in a very clear way with
    excellent voice, eye
    contact and body
    language. Poster was
    engaging.
    Research was presented
    in a clear way with very
    good voice, eye contact
    and body language.
    Poster was engaging.
    Research was presented
    in a clear way with good
    voice, eye contact and
    body language. Poster
    was engaging.
    Research was presented
    in a clear way. One
    element of voice, eye
    contact or body
    language hindered
    presentation. Poster was
    engaging.
    5
    Assessment Criteria
    F3  F2  F1  F0
    1
    Layout and
    Introduction
    identification,
    academic reliability
    10%
    Assessment followed
    most elements of style
    guide. Well set out. Weak
    identification of text,
    and/or analysis of its
    academic reliability.
    Some elements of the
    style guide missing.
    Layout and presentation
    poor. Unsatisfactory
    identification of text
    and/or analysis of its
    academic reliability.
    Style guide not followed.
    Layout poor. Does not
    include identification of
    text, and/or analysis of its
    academic reliability.
    No identification of
    the text or analysis
    of its academic
    reliability
    2
    Introduction
    purpose, preview
    10%
    Weak enunciation of
    purpose and/or preview of
    report and/or less than
    comprehensive overview
    of the main sections of the
    text or purpose missing.
    Report and/or text preview
    and/or purpose may be
    missing.
    Report preview and
    purpose missing or text
    preview and purpose
    missing.
    No purpose and
    preview.
    3
    Evidence of Active
    Reading (SQ3R)
    15%
    Passably detailed
    evidence of active reading
    was submitted. Questions/
    answers are well-
    paraphrased. Important
    details of reference are
    missing on notes.
    Passably detailed
    evidence of active reading
    was submitted but large
    sections of the
    questions/answers are
    either not paraphrased or
    are poorly paraphrased.
    Important details of
    reference may be missing
    on notes.
    Evidence of active reading
    was submitted but is
    sparsely detailed
    AND/OR no source was
    submitted
    No evidence of
    active reading was
    submitted.
    4
    Summary
    20%
    Inadequate summary of
    main points and/or the
    relationship between
    them.
    Incomplete summary of
    main points and/or very
    weak relationship
    established between them.
    Very weak and incomplete
    summary of main points
    and/or no relationship
    established between them.
    No summary of main
    points.
    5
    Conclusion 10%  Weak summary of report
    or concluding statement of
    relationship of text to the
    semester topic. Weak
    details of further research.
    Very weak summary or

    Introduction to Technical  Article Review 代写
    concluding statement of
    relationship of text to the
    semester topic. No details
    of further research.
    No summary of report
    and/or concluding
    statement does not relate
    text to the semester topic.
    No details of further
    research.
    No conclusion.
    6
    Referencing
    5%
    In-text reference present
    with serious errors or
    omissions and/or end-of-
    text reference present but
    with serious errors or
    omissions.
    In-text reference mostly
    incorrect and/or end-of-
    text reference mostly
    incorrect.
    In-text reference missing
    and/or end-of-text
    reference missing.
    No referencing.
    7
    Language and
    paragraph structure
    10%
    Overall meaning is clear.
    Paper has some errors in
    grammar and/or spelling
    and/or paragraph
    structure.
    Overall meaning is
    understandable. Paper has
    many errors in grammar
    and/or spelling and/or
    paragraph structure.
    Some parts are hard to
    understand. Paper has
    many errors in grammar
    and/or spelling and/or
    paragraph structure.
    Report unreadable.
    8
    Poster Presentation
    20%
    Research was presented
    in an understandable way
    however one or two
    elements of voice, eye
    contact or body language
    hindered presentation.
    Poster was reasonable.
    Poster was not loaded on
    to TURNITIN.
    Presentation was not very
    clear or did not discuss
    the case study. Poster was
    cluttered and/or hard to
    understand. Poster was
    not loaded on to
    TURNITIN.
    Presentation was difficult
    to understand and / or no
    poster was prepared.
    Poster was not loaded on
    to TURNITIN.
    No presentation.
    Introduction to Technical  Article Review 代写